UARTSIFARTSI vs Babelia

Both projects enumerate every possible pattern within their chosen sizes and palettes. They pick very different rules for how to line those images up.

Babelia (Library of Babel)

Babelia, the image annex of libraryofbabel.info, enumerates every possible 640×416 image in 4,096 colors. You either request a random image or paste an address and the site renders that specific picture. The space is astronomical — roughly 4096640·416 images — and the interface is deliberately random-access: there is no meaningful “next” image.

UARTSIFARTSI

UARTSIFARTSI enumerates every black-and-white pattern at its completed spiral sizes in one deterministic order. An image’s address is a triple (w, h, k):

  1. Follow the completed sizes: 1×1 → 2×1 → 2×2 → 3×2 → 3×3 → … → 32×32.
  2. Count all 2w·h patterns at each size before adding a row or column. Only the 63 completed square and near-square sizes belong to this order.
  3. Within a pair, walk k from 0 to 2^n − 1. Read k as an n = w·h-bit binary number, starting with the least-significant bit at the fixed origin and following the spiral; 0 is white, 1 is black.

Side by side

PropertyUARTSIFARTSIBabelia
PaletteBlack & white (2 colors)4,096 colors
Sizes63 completed spiral sizes, 1×1 to 32×32Fixed 640×416
OrderingTotal, deterministic (w, h, k)Random access by address
Next / previous imageYes — except at the catalogue endpointsNot meaningful
Naming / communityAnyone can name any imageNo naming layer
URL shape/s/w/h/k (spiral); /img/w/h/k (legacy)Opaque address string

Which one should I use?

Use Babelia if you want a Borges-flavored plunge into a huge, high-resolution color space with no path through it. Use UARTSIFARTSI if you want a shared, walkable catalogue of black-and-white patterns at the spiral sizes — with stable URLs, a next image, and names contributed by other people.

Ready to explore? Start at the front page or jump to a specific image like /img/3/3/170.